Thursday, April 10, 2008

Traitors of the Science Stream

Now, if any of you readers turn out to be the sort of people I am going to describe, please let me inform you that we each have the freedom of speech. And anyway, I'm a society reformer wannabe, so I must complain. Nowadays, intellect isn't about what you do but what things you complain about. THat is because the intellectuals are being suppressed. I hope the ISA will smash to bits.

I'M TALKING ABOUT THESE FREAKING SUPER-ACHIEVING SCIENCE STREAM STUDENTS!!!

Yes. And not any ordinary science student, I mean those smart-ass ones who are in Science for no reason, and who wish to be accountants and businessmen when they grow up ...
They are such shallow faeces-heads! I dare not use the 4-letter word. I heard the math and physics genius say he wants to be a businessman to "MAKE LOTS OF MONEY!" I tell you i was as though a blow had been slapped on my face. So basically, we're in science for our cursed REPUTATIONS, are we not?
One top scorer went:"I feel I'm wasting my time studying science. I mean, I 'm not going to do it for a career."
And these people who do not lack grey matter are desrerrting science for BUSINESS!!! THat what is the point of staying here????
Even the TOP SCORER IS GOING TO BE AN ACCOUNTANT!!!
HOW IS THE FIELD OF SCIENCE GOING TO PROGRESS WITHOUT SUFFICIENT GENIUSES??? THEY ARE BETRAYERS!!! WE ARE GOING OT BECOME BARBARIANS. AND THEY'LL BE WASTING THEIR BRAINS ON MONEY AND NOT ACADEMIA!!!
Nowadays, many people who do science in uni are those who can't get other qualifications. Well, some of them. THe thing is science is an analystical subject. You need people with force, determination, intellect, logic. And science ppl take medicine or engineering. They are just conformists who may be to afariad to take othe specialised fields. I(f any of you are REALLY devoted to medicine I apologise. ) How about, say, microbiology? With non-geniuses taking the other science fields, it will not experience much reformation and discovery. And less popular.
Interest in science is declining. ppl are money-mad. they think they can be rich by being businessmen. Now the intellectual circle among young amateurs will decrease. Ppl will just learn conventional science instead of making new theories and discoveries. They won't learn to be philosophical and analytical and think for themselves. How will we have new ideas and reforms? How will we raise a generation of intellectuals? If science becomes unfashionable (it already is except for engineering) we will become shallow barbarians and half-civilised savages. And how will we start a Science Movement for Thinkers?

The trouble with the government is that it doesn't provide good teachers and subjects for businessman wannabes with high scores. THese wannabes are only shallow money-makers who have utterly no devotion to science or the Upper Intellect. Actually, they're animals - bad animals I mean - and cleverer too, only people are convinced that they are Superhumans. I beg to differ. They are just status crazy. THe gov is not much better by providing inept teachers for the so-called dumbo classes. If there were one or two GOOD arts classes, and they were presrigious those money-eyers would be rushing over there. It is un fair that they are good at physics or math when they have no intention to work in that field. THey study hard for some A's and poof! All gone. When some other course would suit them better. It's the prsetige of being a techie, you see. It's all about the name game.

The gov is science-mad with their silly machines and low-class technology. THey allocate more science classes for bio-haters. THey are real dummies. Science is intellectial, logical, for devoted ppl - you must reserve them for the best and the passionate. So the shallowness of top scorers is the gov's fault for saying arts is dumb.

If you are dedicated to the elevated field of Science, you are a revolutionist. I salute you. Feedback is welcome

I love literature, but it is an artistic science. Or a scientific Art. Ugh. Philosophy's confusing.

No comments: